Functional characterization of the retinal output upon optogenetic stimulation
-
1
Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, Germany
-
2
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Motivation:
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) affect more than 2 million people worldwide. A series of promising attempts for partial vision restoration exist, which comprise retinal implants, gene-replacement therapy, stem cell transplantation and optogenetics. Pre-clinical assessment of a successful restoration strategy may be obtained using a system identification approach. Here we investigate this hypothesis for stimulation of opsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells and simultaneous recording using a CMOS-based high-density microelectrode array (CMOS MEA).
Material and Methods:
1) Transgenic mice expressing a ChR2-EYFP fusion protein under control of the endogenous parvalbumine promoter were obtained by intercrossing of B6.129P2-Pvalbtm1(cre)Arbr/J and B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm32(CAG-COP4*H134R/EYFP)Hze/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock No. 017320 and 024109). Genotyping by means of genomic PCR confirmed the expected genotype.
2) Customized spatial and temporal light patterns are created by using a combination of selectable LEDs and a digital mirror device (DMD). The patterned light stimuli allow to precisely stimulate retinal cells whose spiking response is recorded by the CMOS MEA beneath the retinal sample. The identification of spikes and spike sorting is performed based on a convolutive ICA approach [Leibig et al. 2016].
3) Based on a method pioneered by Chichilnisky and co-workers [Chichilnisky et al. 2001] the estimation of the mean effective visual stimulus for different RGC types can be derived by considering robust spikes in several repetitions of the same stimulus followed by the calculation of the spike triggered average stimulus (STA).
Results and Discussion:
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) were first stimulated by light flashes and by white noise stimuli (photopic regime). RGCs were broadly classified based on their temporal filters and the polarities of their response (ON vs. OFF). Temporal filters showed ON or OFF polarity with a mean time-to-peak of 50 ms.
The optogenetic response of that RGC subpopulation expressing ChR2 was identified upon blocking glutamate receptors. Brief (4 ms) light flashes revealed a reliable response of the Chr2 - positive cells.
White noise stimuli revealed that all optogenetically derived STAs are much shorter (~10ms) than optically derived STAs and show an ON-type polarity only. Localized stimulation was used to analyse the spatial selectivity, which could be obtained by optogenetic stimulation.
Conclusion:
The presented method demonstrates that simultaneous optogenetic stimulation and identification of the induced signals is feasible without any artefact. Mean effective stimuli (temporal filters) can be recovered from optogenetic stimulation. Ongoing research investigates the spatial selectivity and to what degree the contrast coding is affected if all retinal output is converted into ON-type of stimulus.
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the German Ministry for education and Research (BMBF, FKZ: 031L0059A).
References
Leibig, C., Wachtler, T., Zeck, G. (2016). Unsupervised neural spike sorting for high-density microelectrode arrays with convolutive independent component analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods, 271, 1-13.
Chichilnisky, E. J. (2001). A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 12(2), 199-213.
Keywords:
Optogenetic stimulation,
microelectrode arrays,
ChR2 expressing mice,
retinal ganglion cells (RGCs),
vision research
Conference:
MEA Meeting 2018 | 11th International Meeting on Substrate Integrated Microelectrode Arrays, Reutlingen, Germany, 4 Jul - 6 Jul, 2018.
Presentation Type:
Oral Presentation
Topic:
Stimulation strategies
Citation:
Reh
M,
Kriebel
M,
Thewes
R and
Zeck
G
(2019). Functional characterization of the retinal output upon optogenetic stimulation.
Conference Abstract:
MEA Meeting 2018 | 11th International Meeting on Substrate Integrated Microelectrode Arrays.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fncel.2018.38.00045
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
22 Mar 2018;
Published Online:
17 Jan 2019.
*
Correspondence:
Mrs. Miriam Reh, Natural and Medical Sciences Institute, Reutlingen, Germany, reh.miriam@gmx.de