Dynamic changes in direction and frequency range of inter-areal cortical interactions revealed by non-parametric Granger causality
-
1
Radboud University, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Netherlands
Models suggest that communication between brain areas could be mediated by oscillations in specific frequency bands. This hypothesis is supported by electrophysiological measurements wherein the direction and frequency of the interaction between brain areas varied during the different stages of a cognitive task. Frequency-resolved granger causality (GC) is used often for this analysis, but it has been derived for stationary linear processes, which may not be appropriate for brain activity. Our goal was to determine whether for nonlinear processes conditional GC could still distinguish direct connections from indirect ones and to what extent dynamic changes in the frequency & direction of interaction could be accurately detected. For this the properties of the GC determined parametrically, through fitting an autoregressive process of a fixed order, were compared to those obtained via non-parametric GC, which only uses the measured spectral matrix.
Oscillations in each cortical area were represented by a low-dimensional nonlinear model driven by white noise, whose standard deviation represented the level of activity in the respective areas. In addition, we analyzed the responses from two coupled networks of spiking neurons in the same way. We found that the direction of interaction between reciprocally connected cortical areas was determined by the level of activity, going from areas with high activity to those with low activity, which could be modulated on fast time scales. The frequency band of interaction was determined by the sending area.
For linear processes, the parametric GC had the lowest bias and variance compared to non-parametric GC (Figure 1), but was not appropriate for the nonlinear model and network model, because the oscillations could not be modeled accurately by autoregressive processes of a reasonable order. The non-parametric GC correctly represented the ground truth connectivity when multi-taper spectral estimates were used, but when multi-tapering made the spectral peaks too broad, artifacts emerged.
Taken together, the GC analysis revealed a simple rule for the direction and frequency band of communication between cortical areas, specifically “the loudest area gets heard”, which can account for recent experimental results in which the frequency band of communication was direction dependent.
Figure 1. The parametric Granger Causality (GC) had a lower bias than the non-parametric GC. The lowest bias was obtained when the spectral matrix or parameters of the autoregressive process were averaged before calculating the GC. In each panel the top graph is the parametric GC and the bottom graph is the non-parametric GC. The blue line is the analytical result, the black solid line is the calculated result. The gray bands represent the standard deviation of the mean. For the left panels (A,C) there was a connection from X to Y (but no Y to X connection), whereas for the right panels (B,D) there was no connection. For the top panels (A,B), the GC was calculated for each trial and then averaged, whereas for the bottom panels (C,D) the spectral matrix or parameters were averaged first and then the GC was calculated.
Keywords:
oscillations,
Granger causality,
Information Theory,
population models,
synchrony
Conference:
Neuroinformatics 2013, Stockholm, Sweden, 27 Aug - 29 Aug, 2013.
Presentation Type:
Poster
Topic:
Computational neuroscience
Citation:
Tiesinga
PH
(2013). Dynamic changes in direction and frequency range of inter-areal cortical interactions revealed by non-parametric Granger causality.
Front. Neuroinform.
Conference Abstract:
Neuroinformatics 2013.
doi: 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00116
Copyright:
The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers.
They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.
The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.
Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.
For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.
Received:
08 Apr 2013;
Published Online:
11 Jul 2013.
*
Correspondence:
Prof. Paul H Tiesinga, Radboud University, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Nijmegen, 6525AJ, Netherlands, P.Tiesinga@science.ru.nl